Skip to main content

Expertise Beyond Numbers – VHA Accounting Solutions

When SARS finally issued Binding General Ruling 16 (Issue 3), many VAT vendors breathed a sigh of relief. Several long-standing apportionment uncertainties were clarified.

But don’t be fooled, the new rules introduce fresh technical and compliance challenges that will catch the unwary.

In simple terms, BGR 16 tells VAT vendors how to calculate how much VAT they’re allowed to claim back when they make a mix of:

  • Taxable supplies (VATable- you can claim input VAT), and
  • Non-taxable supplies (exempt / out of scope – you can’t).

This calculation is called apportionment.

Before BGR 16 (Issue 3), the rules were messy, inconsistent, and often harsh, especially when it came to dividends and interest.

SARS tried to “fix” this. They partly did. But they also made it more technical.

The General Rules – Easier, But Not Effortless

For VAT vendors making only limited non-taxable supplies, the revised apportionment framework is generally more workable.

However, dividends and interest require special attention.

The full amounts are no longer included in the apportionment calculation

Instead, diluted amounts must be included, which involves some serious mathematical gymnastics to calculate correctly.

Simpler in theory, but easy to get wrong in practice.

More Complex Rules for Financial Transactions

BGR 16 introduces far more complex rules for vendors involved in financial transactions.

Entities operating in this space should take note:

Incorrect treatment can materially distort the apportionment percentage

This directly affects input VAT recovery and audit risk

Transitional Rules – A Hidden Risk Area

The ruling includes detailed transitional provisions governing the move from the old apportionment rules to the new framework.

These transitional adjustments are not optional and misunderstanding them can lead to non-compliance and understatements.

New Annual Reporting Requirement (Big Change)

For the first time, VAT vendors applying apportionment must:

Submit the recomputed apportionment percentage annually

Disclose the adjustments made during the year as a result

This is a new compliance obligation and should not be treated as a box-ticking exercise.

Importance of the change

BGR 16 (Issue 3) is not just a technical update, it fundamentally changes how apportionment is calculated, adjusted and reported.

Simple example to tie this together

Before: Almost all dividends and interest were thrown into the apportionment calculation, which badly reduced VAT recovery.

After: Only a portion of dividends and interest is included, but you now have to calculate that portion.

So: less punitive, more complicated.

The facts (same business in both cases)

A VAT-registered company earns the following in a year:

Taxable sales (VATable): R10,000,000

Dividends received: R5,000,000

Interest received: R1,000,000

Total income:

Before: R16,000,000

After: still R16,000,000, but treated differently

BEFORE (old approach)

Dividends and interest were fully included in the apportionment calculation.

Apportionment percentage:

Taxable supplies ÷ Total supplies

= R10,000,000 ÷ R16,000,000

= 62.5%

The vendor could only claim 62.5% of their input VAT, even though dividends required almost no VAT-bearing costs.

This felt unfair and often was.

AFTER

Dividends and interest are no longer included in full.

Instead, SARS says:

Only include the portion of dividends and interest that relates to taxable activities.

That portion is usually very small (e.g. admin, treasury oversight).

Let’s assume a 10% attribution to taxable activities (purely illustrative).

Adjusted inclusion:

Dividends included: R5,000,000 × 10% = R500,000

Interest included: R1,000,000 × 10% = R100,000

Revised apportionment calculation:

Taxable supplies = R10,000,000

Total supplies = R10,600,000

Apportionment % = 94.3%

The vendor can now claim 94.3% of their input VAT instead of 62.5%.

Much better, but only if the calculation is done correctly and justified.

Assumptions must be reasonable and defensible

 

While every reasonable effort is taken to ensure the accuracy and soundness of the contents of this publication, neither the writer nor the publisher will bear any responsibility for the consequences of any actions based on information or recommendations contained herein. Our material is for informational purposes.

Ask Vee
Ask Vee
Ask Vee
Ask Vee
Ask Vee
500

Start New Chat?

This will clear your current conversation.

Disclaimer

The responses provided by Ask Vee are intended as general guidance only. While every effort is made to provide accurate and up-to-date information, the system may not always be correct or complete. Ask Vee should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional advice. For critical or material financial decisions, please consult a qualified professional within our firm. VHA Accounting Solutions Inc. does not accept liability for any reliance placed on the responses generated by Ask Vee.